data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d884/7d88449d8e412b2d44f0753fd0f5dd2ebcb90fe4" alt="Dr. Z. on mindfulness (part 4)"
Dr. Z. on mindfulness (part 4)
In this episode, Dr. Z. share with you some tips on how to practice mindfulness-on-the-go when things go wrong, south, and terribly bad.
In this episode, Dr. Z. share with you some tips on how to practice mindfulness-on-the-go when things go wrong, south, and terribly bad.
Do you have to have a puppy face or a poker face when practicing mindfulness? Is mindfulness different than meditation?
Mindfulness is all over; in academic settings, social media, low-key conversations, tv shows, media news, and more. We’re living in a mindfulness revolution. Yet, despite all the dissemination, there are still misconceptions about it.
In this episode, Dr. Z discusses common myths about mindfulness, how to practice it, and how you can put it into action in your day-to-day life.
In this episode, Dr. Z shares how to practice mindfulness on-the-go when dealing with overwhelming fear-based emotions, why practicing mindfulness-on-the-go in your day-to-day life is important, and tips to catch some of the most common responses when dealing with uncomfortable experiences.
Each week I create resources to get unstuck from worries, fears, anxieties, and obsessions so you can stop playing-it-safe and start living. If you think these resources are helpful, please share them with others!
D espite what most people think, behavioral science is not an abstract concept or a theoretical model reserved for academicians or the bookshelves of a library.
Behavioral science, to me, is a world’s philosophy for understanding our day-to-day interactions.
Every conversation, every thought, every struggle, every moment of joy, and, basically, every experience we have, can be appreciated, seen, and understood through the lens of behavioral science. The reality is that behavioral science – and Acceptance and Commitment skills as a direct application of behavioral science – are part of our lives, from the moment we wake up to the moment we fall asleep.
Inspired by the series Modern Love, I’m sharing with you a contemporary love story and with it, I’m also sharing how skills derived from behavioral science can help you to navigate romantic encounters.
Think about it, as our lives unfold, our quest for purpose and meaning also unfold—and also our quest for love. Who doesn’t want to love and be loved?
We do experience love in so many ways in our lives, and if we’re fortunate, we experience a special type of love: romantic.
He and she met after the click of a mouse and the swipe of a screen on their cell phones and in the midst of online dating companies creating a paradox of choice that keeps us chasing the illusion of what love is and perpetuates questions like, Why should I settle for someone who falls short of my expectations when there are other options [just a click away]? Why should I settle for less when there are many more people to meet [just a click away]?
They liked each other’s profiles, and for ten days exchanged texts daily. They agreed to meet on a Sunday morning.
On their first date, they wandered around by the bay; they shared parts of their lives, their backgrounds, and family jokes. They laughed, enjoyed the nice weather, and, after six hours, ended their date by sharing an octopus dish, a salad, and a glass of wine.
On their second date, they went for a hike: They walked through the trees and felt the contrast of the temperature in the shadows and under the sun. They laughed about their weeks, shared their relationship pasts with one another, laughed about being lost, and finished their hike eating octopus and a small salad. They started their date at 10:00 a.m., and by the time they said goodbye, it was 6:00 p.m.
On their third date, a week later, he was sick and had been coughing the whole week, but didn’t want to cancel their date. Their date was in the middle of the week, so he made sure to take a nap before seeing her. They went to dinner, and while sharing a soup, ceviche, a glass of white wine, and a cup of chamomile tea, he discovered her passion for research and she discovered his curious mind. They were the last people to leave the restaurant and finished the night by sharing a good laugh.
After their third date, she didn’t contact him.
He didn’t know what happened.
He felt sad and confused and didn’t know what to do. All he remembered was having fun conversations, sharing laughs, enjoying one another’s company, wandering the streets together, and always looking forward to the next gathering. He didn’t want to bother her or come across as “needy.” After ten days, he decided to call her:
On their fourth date, they went for a bike ride, took a break in a park, laid down on the grass, held hands, and then spent the rest of the afternoon wandering the streets of a metropolitan city, grabbing a cocktail at a marroqui bar close to 10:00 p.m. When they said goodbye to each other, they kissed for the first time.
On their fifth date, he said, “I like you and would like to date you exclusively.”
She replied, “I like you a lot too, and it has been so exciting and refreshing to meet you. But I don’t know how things will go between us. I need to know more. I need to know that things will be fine.”
We all have been taught to understand things with our minds, to make sense of everything and everyone around us with our thoughts, and to think through things and situations carefully. We have also learned to think of our minds as these omnipotent organs that know what is true at all times.
She responded in a way that felt natural to her brain.
It’s so tricky.
She deeply wanted to develop romantic intimacy in her life. She deeply wanted to be seen and to see another person through caring and passionate eyes. She deeply wanted to develop a romantic relationship and grow together with another person.
Yet, despite being clear on how romantic relationships are important to her and making the commitment to go on dates, her mind was overthinking.
Overthinking patterns have many variations, colors, and shapes, and everyone overthinks. But interestingly, we don’t tend to overthink good outcomes, compliments, or positive scenarios. We overthinking about negative outcomes, things we don’t have control of, what-if scenarios, embarrassing moments and much more.
You may go on a date and, for a long time after, replay in your mind what the other person said, how you responded, how the other person responded. If you’re running late to a gathering, you may have thoughts like, I’m the worst friend ever; they’re going to be disappointed in me. I cannot do anything right.
Does that sound familiar?
Going back to one of the main characters in this dating story, her mind was overthinking in two particular ways:
Let’s take a look at each one of these thinking patterns:
We all have a need to make sense of the unknowns that show up in our lives for instance, when you go to a new restaurant and don’t know how the food is going to taste, or when you go on a date and don’t know if your date is going to like you or if you’re going to enjoy their company.
Our experience dealing with confusing situations is unique to each one of us; there are no two people that feel ambiguity the same way and with the same intensity. Intolerance of uncertainty feels different from situation to situation, and we can react differently to it from one moment to the next.
Some of us are more sensitive to uncertainty than others, and our reactions can go from extreme aversion to even extreme attraction. When we feel an extreme aversion to confusing situations, we may experience high levels of fear, rejection, and emotional negativity; on the other hand, when we feel extreme attraction toward an ambiguous situation, we may be curious, we might welcome the challenge, and we may even enjoy the process.
The mind of our main character has a low tolerance for uncertainty and organized a thinking pattern of committing to the possibility of exploring how the relationship will go only if she knew it would go well – a tricky business.
The human mind also tends to try to understand, analyze, and collect endless data, as if it is a 100 percent reliable organ and everything needs to be filtered through it.
Let’s unpack this a bit: Our brains have been protecting us since the beginning of humanity. Our ancestors’ minds developed survival functions that kept them alive – anticipating potential enemies, remembering old threats, and considering all of the what-if possibilities of wild animals and enemies.
As time passed, and we moved from prehistory all the way to the industrial revolution and the information age, our minds – as sophisticated as they are – didn’t have a chance to catch up with all those changes. So these days, each of us is walking around with a brain designed in prehistoric times, and with protective functions that equipped us for those times, not necessarily for our current situations.
In other words, our minds never got the opportunity to be upgraded to our current living conditions, or to the environment we live in now, and, as a result, we’re more prone to thinking errors than ever before.
Daniel Kahneman (2011) has described this phenomenon in detail when describing slow thinking and fast thinking, and Eastern philosophies have recognized for years our minds’ limitations.
In our dating story, our main character’s mind had four direct experiences of fun, exciting, and rich dates, and yet, her mind wanted to “know more,” as if having more thinking data would help her make the right choice, and as if her mind somehow had the truth about how to effectively handle that situation.
There is experiential knowledge, and there is the hope that responding to thinking with more thinking will give us all the information and certainty we need to make a decision.
Once again, it’s a tricky business.
Both overthinking patterns – searching for certainty and wanting to know more – while helpful at times, can keep us stuck in our own heads and can feed into our rabbit hole of worry.
When applied to dating, these overthinking patterns may reinforce serial dating behaviors – moving from one person to another, searching for a long-lasting feeling of excitement, avoiding commitment, and confusing lust for love.
But what’s worse is that these patterns can keep a person from one of the most transformative experiences we can hope for – true love – and the intimacy and connection that comes from being with a partner.
Few people know that thoughts are letters and words together that our minds come up with and that we can choose how to respond to them. Acceptance and commitment skills invite you to learn how your mind does its own minding and how it has a life of its own.
And, when you learn to choose how to respond to your thoughts, everything changes. This is when you take charge of your actions (instead of being bossed around by your mind and letting it take you in the opposite direction from where you want to go.)
And this is pushing you to respond to doubt with yet more thinking, ask yourself:
Behavioral science deals with all of our behaviors – private and public – and while there is much more to say about this dating narrative, and there are different lenses through which we can look at it, I can only speak to and reference my areas of expertise.
And if you’ve made it to the end of this article, I would like to share two more thoughts with you:
I leave you with this quote:
“I want to know if you are willing to live day by day with the consequence of love.”
– David Whyte
Reading Time: 3 minutes
When having to make important decisions – e.g. should I apply for this new job? Should I marry this person? Should I buy this property? Should I continue dating this person? What school should I enroll my kid in? Should I move to another city? Some very popular advice that most people give us, is “trust your gut feelings.”
This is a hot topic every time I discuss it because I radically disagree with it when it’s presented as an absolute without taking into consideration a person’s situation, context, and history. Most importantly, the popular advice of “trust your feelings” is not congruent with what we know these days in decision theory, social psychology, and organizational psychology.
Here is a summary of the key ideas from two scholars: Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (Kahneman, Slovic, & Tversky, 1982) who were interested in “heuristics and biases.” They were curious about how people make mistakes, how people learn, and how people make knwoledge-based decisions. After spending hours analyzing complex cognitive processes, they identified two types of systems to understand how the mind operates:
Any new idea that doesn’t fit what is supposed to be – according to our mind and based on previous associations in system 1 – is ambiguous and therefore, is quickly dismissed. Then, our mind pushes us to believe that we “know this already” and we end up missing opportunities for learning by experience or deeper examinations of that new data.
Our mind doesn’t like ambiguity and prefers to hold on with white knuckles to familiar interpretations. Scary, right?
Kahneman’s findings have been applied to organizational psychology, in particular, to understand decision-making processes. In 2003, Harvard Business Review magazine conducted a survey of executives from a private firm about gut feelings. Their findings revealed that 45 percent of the executives relied more on them than on the data when making decisions about their businesses. An interesting finding, right? This is perhaps another reflection of the advice “trust your gut feeling.”
Interestingly, and a large body of research has established that there is no relationship between an effective decision a person makes based on trusting their gut feelings and the outcome of it unless a person has expertise in a particular topic.
Basically, gut reactions are extremely helpful only when expertise goes along with them (Dane, Rockmann, & Pratt, 2012). For instance, a firefighter, after participating in more than fifty rescue operations, has the expertise to trust his gut feelings, whereas a firefighter who is participating in an operation for the first time may have gut feelings pulling him in all directions and opening the possibility of making the wrong decision.
So, when facing a decision, and listening to the words “trust your gut feeling,” I invite you to step back and distinguish emotional noise from true awareness.
Lastly, just to clarify, I’m not saying that paying attention to our feelings is not important, of course, it is. I’m saying that taking the advice of “trusting your gut feelings” without looking at the uniqueness of your situation and your experience can lead you to problematic situations. For instance, meeting someone for the first time and getting a strong feeling that they’re the one you want to spend the rest of your life with, without taking the time to get to know them.
Emotions are to be felt; some emotions are to keep and learn from, and other emotions – perhaps a lot – are to be noticed and then, tossed.
Reading Time: 4 minutes
Most people use the end of the year as a time for reflection, planning, and assessing how things have been for them. I personally like to set mini-quarterly reviews on my schedule along with reset time and spend more time in a mid-year review. I very much welcome a moment to pause, reflect on what has happened, what’s next, and how I want to live my life.
So, instead of looking strictly at goals or accomplishments, I like to reflect on the:
That’s why I called this process “values-based year review,” and you can do it any time that works for you. More than having a specific time to complete this review, it is more important to reflect on how you have been living your life, what makes it challenging, what happens under your skin when pursuing what matters, and what you need to do next to be the person you want to be.
If you want to do your own values-based mid-year review, here is a 21-page template you can use; it includes a description of 9 areas, a values thesaurus, a values dashboard and reflective prompts for each area in your life.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD YOUR VALUES-BASED REVIEW TEMPLATE
As I reflected in the last couple of moments, below are the theme, highlights, and key learnings that emerged for me.
Chaos and connection
2020 and the beginning of 2021 were very challenging times. The pandemic unfolded, Black Lives Movement, a presidential election in the United States, unexpectedly losing close friends, and my health being affected made it one of the hardest years and also, one of the most compassionate ones.
You see, as a full-time psychologist, specialized in fear-based struggles – I’m sure many of my colleagues relate to this – we breathe and live situations related to all types of fears every single day. But, when you have an insurmountable amount of stressors around you, those experiences augment exponentially.
Yet, for over 12 months we all did our best to show up to the people we work with and care about while acknowledging our vulnerabilities, limitations, and common humanity. If you’re a provider in mental health reading this newsletter, my sincere appreciation for all that you did the last couple of months!
In the midst of all the political, environmental, social, cultural, and economic chaos we went through, in one way or another, my connections with others were also reinforced, for the most part, revitalized in some cases, and renewed in others. It was in those catching-up moments that I realized, once again, that life is all about connecting with others and creating memories with the ones we love. It was in those moments that I experienced “chaos and connection” co-existing next to each other.
Key learnings
Highlights
My thirst for creating resources and owning my content has grown tremendously. Here are the highlights from the last 6 months and some from 2020 – 2021:
Playing-it-Safe: A project from the heart:
The question of “how can we get unstuck from ineffective playing-it-safe moves so we can live a meaningful, fulfilling, and purposeful life?” is fundamental in my work, and my thirst for answering it has grown significantly.
Playing-it-safe has been one of the highlights of what has been a weird year.
In 2020, I launched the Playing-it-Safe newsletter and the Playing-it-Safe podcast without knowing how these projects were going to be received. For the last few months, I’ve sent out this newsletter every Wednesday in an effort to share research-based skills derived from behavioral science, Acceptance and Commitment ‘Therapy, reflections, and resources related to fear-based struggles.
You have witnessed the evolution of my style in the podcast as it’s a new way of creating resources for me and have heard me trying different formats. Little by little, right?
The response from all of you to these resources has been bigger and much better than I could have expected. Thank you for keeping in mind these resources!
It’s my goal that Playing-it-safe continues to grow and get better in the next months. I have some exciting plans in the works for it. Stay tuned!!!
Thank you for spending some time with me each week.
I think learning to relate skillfully to fear-based emotions is a very important topic and I’m excited to continue creating more resources about it in the coming months. What am I missing? Is there something that you’d like to see me write about in the future? If so, please send me an email at doctorz@thisisidoctorz.com.
As always, if you think a friend of yours would be interested in fear-based reactions, please share this newsletter with them!