On Love, Overthinking, and Behavioral Science

On Love, Overthinking, and Behavioral Science

Reading Time: 8 minutes

D espite what most people think, behavioral science is not an abstract concept or a theoretical model reserved for academicians or the bookshelves of a library.

Behavioral science, to me, is a world’s philosophy for understanding our day-to-day interactions. 

Every conversation, every thought, every struggle, every moment of joy, and, basically, every experience we have, can be appreciated, seen, and understood through the lens of behavioral science. The reality is that behavioral science – and Acceptance and Commitment skills as a direct application of behavioral science – are part of our lives, from the moment we wake up to the moment we fall asleep.

Inspired by the series Modern Love, I’m sharing with you a contemporary love story and with it, I’m also sharing how skills derived from behavioral science can help you to navigate romantic encounters.

Think about it, as our lives unfold, our quest for purpose and meaning also unfold—and also our quest for love. Who doesn’t want to love and be loved?

We do experience love in so many ways in our lives, and if we’re fortunate, we experience a special type of love: romantic.

Part I: The Dating Story

He and she met after the click of a mouse and the swipe of a screen on their cell phones and in the midst of online dating companies creating a paradox of choice that keeps us chasing the illusion of what love is and perpetuates questions like, Why should I settle for someone who falls short of my expectations when there are other options [just a click away]? Why should I settle for less when there are many more people to meet [just a click away]?

They liked each other’s profiles, and for ten days exchanged texts daily. They agreed to meet on a Sunday morning.

On their first date, they wandered around by the bay; they shared parts of their lives, their backgrounds, and family jokes. They laughed, enjoyed the nice weather, and, after six hours, ended their date by sharing an octopus dish, a salad, and a glass of wine.

On their second date, they went for a hike: They walked through the trees and felt the contrast of the temperature in the shadows and under the sun. They laughed about their weeks, shared their relationship pasts with one another, laughed about being lost, and finished their hike eating octopus and a small salad. They started their date at 10:00 a.m., and by the time they said goodbye, it was 6:00 p.m.

On their third date, a week later, he was sick and had been coughing the whole week, but didn’t want to cancel their date. Their date was in the middle of the week, so he made sure to take a nap before seeing her. They went to dinner, and while sharing a soup, ceviche, a glass of white wine, and a cup of chamomile tea, he discovered her passion for research and she discovered his curious mind. They were the last people to leave the restaurant and finished the night by sharing a good laugh.

After their third date, she didn’t contact him.

He didn’t know what happened.

He felt sad and confused and didn’t know what to do. All he remembered was having fun conversations, sharing laughs, enjoying one another’s company, wandering the streets together, and always looking forward to the next gathering. He didn’t want to bother her or come across as “needy.” After ten days, he decided to call her:

  • Him: Hi, is this a good time? Can we chat?
  • Her: Yes, of course. So great to hear from you.
  • Him: How have you been?
  • Her: I’ve been doing well, thank you. Busy with work.
  • Him: I know you were dealing with a stressful situation. Did you guys solve it?
  • Her: Yes, that got solved, and it’s all good now.
  • Him: Glad to hear that. Can I ask a question?
  • Her: Yes, of course.
  • Him: I was surprised I didn’t hear from you; I was surprised you didn’t reach out these last ten days. I thought we were having fun.
  • Her: I thought you didn’t like me.
  • Him: . . . I’m confused. . . . Of course I like you. Every date has been fun, and I didn’t notice the time flying by. I was surprised not to hear from you.
  • Her: I really thought you didn’t like me. I don’t know how I arrived at that conclusion. At our last dinner, I thought that maybe you were just being nice to me.
  • Him: No, I was excited to see you. I made sure to take a nap so I could hang out with you.
  • Her: I’m so glad you reached out and that we’re talking because I do want to see you again. I enjoyed your company a lot.

On their fourth date, they went for a bike ride, took a break in a park, laid down on the grass, held hands, and then spent the rest of the afternoon wandering the streets of a metropolitan city, grabbing a cocktail at a marroqui bar close to 10:00 p.m. When they said goodbye to each other, they kissed for the first time.

On their fifth date, he said, “I like you and would like to date you exclusively.”

She replied, “I like you a lot too, and it has been so exciting and refreshing to meet you. But I don’t know how things will go between us. I need to know more. I need to know that things will be fine.”

Part II: The Overthinking Problem

We all have been taught to understand things with our minds, to make sense of everything and everyone around us with our thoughts, and to think through things and situations carefully. We have also learned to think of our minds as these omnipotent organs that know what is true at all times.

She responded in a way that felt natural to her brain.

It’s so tricky.

She deeply wanted to develop romantic intimacy in her life. She deeply wanted to be seen and to see another person through caring and passionate eyes. She deeply wanted to develop a romantic relationship and grow together with another person.

Yet, despite being clear on how romantic relationships are important to her and making the commitment to go on dates, her mind was overthinking.

Overthinking patterns have many variations, colors, and shapes, and everyone overthinks. But interestingly, we don’t tend to overthink good outcomes, compliments, or positive scenarios. We overthinking about negative outcomes, things we don’t have control of, what-if scenarios, embarrassing moments and much more.

You may go on a date and, for a long time after, replay in your mind what the other person said, how you responded, how the other person responded. If you’re running late to a gathering, you may have thoughts like, I’m the worst friend ever; they’re going to be disappointed in me. I cannot do anything right.

Does that sound familiar?

Going back to one of the main characters in this dating story, her mind was overthinking in two particular ways:

  • Searching for certainty about the future of the relationship.
  • Wanting to “know more” – meaning she wanted to learn more about the possibilities of that relationship by thinking about it.

Let’s take a look at each one of these thinking patterns:

(a) Searching for certainty

We all have a need to make sense of the unknowns that show up in our lives for instance, when you go to a new restaurant and don’t know how the food is going to taste, or when you go on a date and don’t know if your date is going to like you or if you’re going to enjoy their company.

Our experience dealing with confusing situations is unique to each one of us; there are no two people that feel ambiguity the same way and with the same intensity. Intolerance of uncertainty feels different from situation to situation, and we can react differently to it from one moment to the next.

Some of us are more sensitive to uncertainty than others, and our reactions can go from extreme aversion to even extreme attraction. When we feel an extreme aversion to confusing situations, we may experience high levels of fear, rejection, and emotional negativity; on the other hand, when we feel extreme attraction toward an ambiguous situation, we may be curious, we might welcome the challenge, and we may even enjoy the process.

The mind of our main character has a low tolerance for uncertainty and organized a thinking pattern of committing to the possibility of exploring how the relationship will go only if she knew it would go well – a tricky business.

(b) Wanting to know more

The human mind also tends to try to understand, analyze, and collect endless data, as if it is a 100 percent reliable organ and everything needs to be filtered through it.

Let’s unpack this a bit: Our brains have been protecting us since the beginning of humanity. Our ancestors’ minds developed survival functions that kept them alive – anticipating potential enemies, remembering old threats, and considering all of the what-if possibilities of wild animals and enemies.

As time passed, and we moved from prehistory all the way to the industrial revolution and the information age, our minds – as sophisticated as they are – didn’t have a chance to catch up with all those changes. So these days, each of us is walking around with a brain designed in prehistoric times, and with protective functions that equipped us for those times, not necessarily for our current situations.

In other words, our minds never got the opportunity to be upgraded to our current living conditions, or to the environment we live in now, and, as a result, we’re more prone to thinking errors than ever before.

Daniel Kahneman (2011) has described this phenomenon in detail when describing slow thinking and fast thinking, and Eastern philosophies have recognized for years our minds’ limitations.

In our dating story, our main character’s mind had four direct experiences of fun, exciting, and rich dates, and yet, her mind wanted to “know more,” as if having more thinking data would help her make the right choice, and as if her mind somehow had the truth about how to effectively handle that situation.

Part III: The Consequences

There is experiential knowledge, and there is the hope that responding to thinking with more thinking will give us all the information and certainty we need to make a decision.

Once again, it’s a tricky business.

Both overthinking patterns – searching for certainty and wanting to know more – while helpful at times, can keep us stuck in our own heads and can feed into our rabbit hole of worry.

When applied to dating, these overthinking patterns may reinforce serial dating behaviors – moving from one person to another, searching for a long-lasting feeling of excitement, avoiding commitment, and confusing lust for love.

But what’s worse is that these patterns can keep a person from one of the most transformative experiences we can hope for – true love – and the intimacy and connection that comes from being with a partner.

Part IV: Key Questions to Undo Those Overthinking Patterns

Few people know that thoughts are letters and words together that our minds come up with and that we can choose how to respond to them. Acceptance and commitment skills invite you to learn how your mind does its own minding and how it has a life of its own.

And, when you learn to choose how to respond to your thoughts, everything changes. This is when you take charge of your actions (instead of being bossed around by your mind and letting it take you in the opposite direction from where you want to go.)

(a) If you’re dealing with a low tolerance for uncertainty:

  • Stop battling against those uncertain thoughts.
  • Ask yourself: Am I willing to go on from here, carrying all these uncertain thoughts wherever I go, noticing how they come and then simply having them?
  • Do not assume something is wrong when you feel uncertain.
  • Observe those uncertain thoughts as though they were printed letters on a page.
  • Make a decision to feel the uncertainty, even if it’s uncomfortable.
  • Check the consequences of your actions when you’re being driven by uncertainty or reacting quickly to it.

(b) If you’re dealing with a reliance on your mind as the arbiter of truth:

And this is pushing you to respond to doubt with yet more thinking, ask yourself:

  • What am I going to trust: my experience or my mind’s desire to know more?
  • What am I going to act on: my wish to know more or my knowledge gained from direct experience?

Behavioral science deals with all of our behaviors – private and public – and while there is much more to say about this dating narrative, and there are different lenses through which we can look at it, I can only speak to and reference my areas of expertise.

Final words

And if you’ve made it to the end of this article, I would like to share two more thoughts with you:

  • I’m not a thinking renegade, but I’m all about a thinking revolution.
  • To be loved and to love, we need the awareness and the courage that behavioral science can help us find in the busyness of our minds.

I leave you with this quote:

“I want to know if you are willing to live day by day with the consequence of love.”

– David Whyte

Don’t trust your gut feelings… when making important decisions

Don’t trust your gut feelings… when making important decisions

Reading Time: 3 minutes

When having to make important decisions – e.g. should I apply for this new job? Should I marry this person? Should I buy this property?  Should I continue dating this person? What school should I enroll my kid in? Should I move to another city? Some very popular advice that most people give us, is “trust your gut feelings.”

This is a hot topic every time I discuss it because I radically disagree with it when it’s presented as an absolute without taking into consideration a person’s situation, context, and history. Most importantly, the popular advice of “trust your feelings” is not congruent with what we know these days in decision theory, social psychology, and organizational psychology.

What D. Kahneman and Tversky taught us about gut feelings and decisions?

Here is a summary of the key ideas from two scholars: Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (Kahneman, Slovic, & Tversky, 1982) who were interested in “heuristics and biases.” They were curious about how people make mistakes, how people learn, and how people make knwoledge-based decisions. After spending hours analyzing complex cognitive processes, they identified two types of systems to understand how the mind operates:

  • System 1 is effortless, quick, automatic, and of associative nature.
  • System 2 is controlled, effortful, logical, and rule-governed. Intuition is considered to be a part of System 1, and like other cognitive processes, only sees what it wants and expects to see.

Any new idea that doesn’t fit what is supposed to be – according to our mind and based on previous associations in system 1 – is ambiguous and therefore, is quickly dismissed. Then, our mind pushes us to believe that we “know this already” and we end up missing opportunities for learning by experience or deeper examinations of that new data.

Our mind doesn’t like ambiguity and prefers to hold on with white knuckles to familiar interpretations. Scary, right?

Kahneman’s findings have been applied to organizational psychology, in particular, to understand decision-making processes.  In 2003, Harvard Business Review magazine conducted a survey of executives from a private firm about gut feelings. Their findings revealed that 45 percent of the executives relied more on them than on the data when making decisions about their businesses. An interesting finding, right? This is perhaps another reflection of the advice “trust your gut feeling.”

Interestingly, and a large body of research has established that there is no relationship between an effective decision a person makes based on trusting their gut feelings and the outcome of it unless a person has expertise in a particular topic.

Are gut reactions ever helpful to make decisions?

Basically, gut reactions are extremely helpful only when expertise goes along with them (Dane, Rockmann, & Pratt, 2012). For instance, a firefighter, after participating in more than fifty rescue operations, has the expertise to trust his gut feelings, whereas a firefighter who is participating in an operation for the first time may have gut feelings pulling him in all directions and opening the possibility of making the wrong decision.

How to make skillful decisions? 

So, when facing a decision, and listening to the words “trust your gut feeling,” I invite you to step back and distinguish emotional noise from true awareness.

  • Gut feelings usually come with a sensation in our body (such as butterflies in our stomach), and strong judgment thoughts or problem-solving thoughts about what to do right away, right now. It’s like a very loud and demanding soundtrack.
  • True emotional awareness, on the other hand, has a different quality. Instead of demanding immediate action, it’s more like having a soft soundtrack that points out what matters.

Lastly, just to clarify, I’m not saying that paying attention to our feelings is not important, of course, it is. I’m saying that taking the advice of “trusting your gut feelings” without looking at the uniqueness of your situation and your experience can lead you to problematic situations. For instance, meeting someone for the first time and getting a strong feeling that they’re the one you want to spend the rest of your life with, without taking the time to get to know them.

Emotions are to be felt; some emotions are to keep and learn from,  and other emotions – perhaps a lot – are to be noticed and then, tossed.

Semi-annual values-based review

Semi-annual values-based review

Reading Time: 4 minutes

 

 

 

Most people use the end of the year as a time for reflection, planning, and assessing how things have been for them. I personally like to set mini-quarterly reviews on my schedule along with reset time and spend more time in a mid-year review. I very much welcome a moment to pause, reflect on what has happened, what’s next, and how I want to live my life.

So, instead of looking strictly at goals or accomplishments, I like to reflect on the:

  1. The actions I took – whether they took me closer to or further away from my values
  2. Internal struggles I had with some ways of thinking and feeling
  3. Learnings I had in different areas of my life. 
  4. Check any themes that have emerged

That’s why I called this process “values-based year review,” and you can do it any time that works for you. More than having a specific time to complete this review, it is more important to reflect on how you have been living your life, what makes it challenging, what happens under your skin when pursuing what matters, and what you need to do next to be the person you want to be.

If you want to do your own values-based mid-year review, here is a 21-page template you can use; it includes a description of 9 areas, a values thesaurus, a values dashboard and reflective prompts for each area in your life.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD YOUR VALUES-BASED REVIEW TEMPLATE

As I reflected in the last couple of moments, below are the theme, highlights, and key learnings that emerged for me.

Chaos and connection

2020 and the beginning of 2021 were very challenging times. The pandemic unfolded, Black Lives Movement, a presidential election in the United States, unexpectedly losing close friends, and my health being affected made it one of the hardest years and also, one of the most compassionate ones.

You see, as a full-time psychologist, specialized in fear-based struggles – I’m sure many of my colleagues relate to this – we breathe and live situations related to all types of fears every single day. But, when you have an insurmountable amount of stressors around you, those experiences augment exponentially.

Yet, for over 12 months we all did our best to show up to the people we work with and care about while acknowledging our vulnerabilities, limitations, and common humanity. If you’re a provider in mental health reading this newsletter, my sincere appreciation for all that you did the last couple of months!

In the midst of all the political, environmental, social, cultural, and economic chaos we went through, in one way or another, my connections with others were also reinforced, for the most part, revitalized in some cases, and renewed in others. It was in those catching-up moments that I realized, once again, that life is all about connecting with others and creating memories with the ones we love.  It was in those moments that I experienced “chaos and connection” co-existing next to each other.

Key learnings

  • Savouring every moment that comes my way allows me to find new rhythms
  • Life is much more manageable when I’m around people that get me
  • Showing up to my friends as the best I could is essential to growing my friendships.
  • Being flexible when unexpected things happen is fundamental to keep doing what matters.
  • I undeniably have a low tolerance for bureaucracy and institutional fakeness.
  • Being self-employed is one of the best things I have ever done in my life.
  • Being real with people is fundamental to building long-lasting relationships

Highlights

My thirst for creating resources and owning my content has grown tremendously. Here are the highlights from the last 6 months and some from 2020 – 2021:

  • I discovered Ness Labs and for the first time, got exposed to a group of kind, bright, and incredible collaborative people from all over the world, interested in science-based ideas and related fields.  It was absolutely mind-blowing and still is,  that this group is non-hierarchical and non-clicky by nature; it’s 100% collaborative.It doesn’t matter which school you went through, who you’re associated with, who you collaborated with, what’s your expertise, or who is in charge.Ness Labs is a culture of collaboration.You know something that could be helpful to another person, you offer it; you have an idea that could be helpful to another person you offer it. You don’t know something, you ask for it. You don’t need to be the expert but a co-creator of knowledge. And trust me when I say that this was mind-blowing to me, I mean it. While I’m not an academician, I have been part of academic and professional environments that, as nice as they are, all are structures around hierarchy, seniority, and under-spoken clickiness.
  • My book Living beyond OCD got published and with it, a comprehensive resource to tackle Obsessive Compulsive Disorder using Acceptance and Commitment Skills.
  • Co-authored a book on process-based therapy that will be released in 2022.
  • Finished a manuscript for people prone to high achieving and perfectionistic actions.
  • Collaborated in two research projects looking at the effectiveness of the interventions described in two of my books (papers have been submitted already, yay).
  • Got a bike – a lifesaver and mood buster.
  • Hosted many zoom calls with friends all over. 

Playing-it-Safe: A project from the heart:

The question of “how can we get unstuck from ineffective playing-it-safe moves so we can live a meaningful, fulfilling, and purposeful life?” is fundamental in my work, and my thirst for answering it has grown significantly.

Playing-it-safe has been one of the highlights of what has been a weird year.

In 2020, I launched the Playing-it-Safe newsletter and the Playing-it-Safe podcast without knowing how these projects were going to be received. For the last few months, I’ve sent out this newsletter every Wednesday in an effort to share research-based skills derived from behavioral science, Acceptance and Commitment ‘Therapy, reflections, and resources related to fear-based struggles.

You have witnessed the evolution of my style in the podcast as it’s a new way of creating resources for me and have heard me trying different formats. Little by little, right?

The response from all of you to these resources has been bigger and much better than I could have expected. Thank you for keeping in mind these resources!

It’s my goal that Playing-it-safe continues to grow and get better in the next months. I have some exciting plans in the works for it. Stay tuned!!! 

Thank you for spending some time with me each week. 

I think learning to relate skillfully to fear-based emotions is a very important topic and I’m excited to continue creating more resources about it in the coming months. What am I missing? Is there something that you’d like to see me write about in the future? If so, please send me an email at doctorz@thisisidoctorz.com.

As always, if you think a friend of yours would be interested in fear-based reactions, please share this newsletter with them!

THE OLD, THE NEW, & WHAT’S “IN” ABOUT BEING A BEHAVIORIST

THE OLD, THE NEW, & WHAT’S “IN” ABOUT BEING A BEHAVIORIST

Imagine if you were in a plane, sitting next to me, and I introduced myself as a behaviorally oriented psychologist/therapist/coach, what comes to your mind? When you hear the word “behaviorism” what pops up in your mind?

Here are some hints: mechanistic, robotic, worksheets, rubber bands, and basically, reductionists of human behavior;  maybe even names like Skinner, Pavlov, or Watson pop up for you.

You see, behaviorism and therefore behaviorists, have historically a bad rap. But, to make sense of this bad rap, let’s step back for a moment, and let’s consider how behaviorism was born.

A little bit of history

The history of behaviorism is full of experiments, research, and studies to understand why we do what we do, as it names indicates, with a strong emphasis on human behavior. This strong focus on behaviors was also happening at a time – around 1950’s-  in which people dealing with worries, fears, anxieties, panic, and obsessions were seeing for years in therapy, their struggles were considered as signs of something wrong with them or with their parents, and spent years in therapy, with some relief or other times perpetuating their suffering. Behaviorism was born in the midst of all that, as the new kid on the block, and applying findings from behavioral science to understand what drives problematic behaviors and how a person can get unstuck.

Despite its success in treating phobias, anxieties, panic, and so on, and in response to all criticisms about being too mechanistic and reductionist – there was a radical shift from focusing on behaviors to focusing on cognitions. Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) was born from that shift; we went from focusing on behavior to prioritizing thoughts and understood every human struggle under the lenses that thinking defines what we think, what we feel, and what we do. It’s like thoughts became the gems of behavioral science

As CBT needed to be disseminated, many protocols were developed for the treatment of all types of psychological problems; as effective as those protocols were, the field got wild and we ended up with many manualized treatments for a particular struggle (e.g. 5-7 treatment manuals for social anxiety). As time passed by, there was an underground group of thinkers questioning what was established – in their own way, sometimes in public, sometimes in their books – but little by little, all those manualized treatments were questioned because the field realized that we got fundamental aspects wrong:

  1. We don’t have control of our thoughts, feelings, or sensations
  2. Attempts to control thoughts make things worse in the long-run
  3. Behaviorism is more robust when adding findings of the science of compassion
  4. Behaviors are not just things we do that are observable and actionable, but everything an organism does
  5. The content of our thoughts is not as relevant as the impact of them to understand our struggles
  6. Acceptance-based skills to all the thoughts, feelings, sensations, and any internal experience we have is required to have amazing lives
  7. Responding flexibly to the yucky stuff that comes under our skin is key to doing what we want to do with our lives
  8. Workability trumps accuracy of thinking
  9. Our context matters
  10. Language represents the good, the bad, and the ugly
  11. Learning by experience is key.

I could write a book for each one of these points. But, here is what I want to tell you right away: behaviorism  – behavioral science – has changed.

Screen Shot 2020 11 03 at 10.26.05 AM

Heads up: please grab yourself a cup of coffee, your favorite blanket, and enjoy the reading!

Hope you do the exercises below 🙂

(1) We Don’t Have Control Of Our Thoughts, Feelings, Or Sensations

Did you know that we have over 6000 thoughts a day? And just to clarify, when referring to thoughts, I’m also referring to images. 

As much as we hope, we do experience all types of internal noise – mind-noise, feeling-noise, and body-noise. Have you noticed how you can be walking on the street and without any intention, your mind wonders about the person walking by you, the smell of the streets, a task from your to-do list? Have you noticed how sometimes you may experience a sense of sadness without anything necessarily bad happening? Have you realized how sometimes you may be watching a movie and, out of the blue, random those thoughts may surprise you and even scare you?  We can choose to intentionally think about something, but that doesn’t diminish our mind’s capacity to naturally come up with all types of content. 

Experiment

Close your eyes for 1-minute and watch what your mind does.

(2) Attempts To Control Thoughts, Feelings, And Sensations Make Things Worse In The Long-run

Think about it, what happens if I tell you not to think of one of your favorite books? Or your favorite dessert? Or your best friend? What does your mind do? Quite likely, your mind came up with thoughts about each one of them right?

Now, let’s take a look at this idea of controlling your feelings. For a moment, I want you to do your best to feel angry; do the best you can to get cranky. What happened? Were you able to do it or were you mimicking facial expression as if when you’re angry?

We cannot control what we feel and sense, it just happens. When you try to distract from a feeling, avoid a feeling, and use any other strategy with the intention of not feeling, all those attempts actually make the emotion last longer. The same happens with thoughts; even when you try to respond to uncomfortable thoughts with all types of thinking strategies – worrying, dwelling on the past, anticipating the future, doubting – you just prolong the struggle that comes with them if you rely on those thinking strategies as a way to manage the distress that comes with some thoughts.

Experiment

When having a negative thought about yourself, try to replace it with a positive one. See how long it lasts until the same negative thought – or a variation of it – shows up again.

(3) Behaviorism Is More Robust When Adding Findings Of The Science Of Compassion

Evolutionary science and decades of research have taught us that our deeper desire for connection and compassion are defining aspects of humanity that have contributed to the survival of our species; when the science of compassion is blended with behavioral science,  we learn to face our pain with gentleness, caring, and tenderness and with it, we also learn to get unstuck for longer periods of time, get unstuck faster, and get better at facing our stuckness.

Experiment

For 1 day, when things don’t go as you were hoping and wanted them to go, see what happens if you go into massive amounts of criticism and negative judgment. How do you feel about yourself?

The next day, when anything you are working on goes wrong, see what happens if you respond to those harsh thoughts with gentleness and talk to yourself as you would talk to your best friend that is struggling.

(4) Behaviors Are Not Just Things We Do That Are Observable And Actionable, But Everything An Organism Does

Behaviorism has been often criticized for being mechanistic, insensitive, cold, and linear; however, as Ramnerö and Törneke (2008) point out if all we do is list behaviors, then it will certainly be superficial, cold, and mechanistic. Within radical behaviorism, we’re understanding human behavior as it happens, with all its complexity and it’s actually a very dynamic process.

We’re constantly behaving – non-stop. Everything you do – whether it’s inside or outside your head, public or private – is a behavior.  So, thinking, dreaming, worrying, mentally rehearsing, are all forms of private behaviors; writing, talking, running, are examples of public behaviors.

Experiment

Notice throughout the day, the public behaviors and private behaviors you’re engaging in. 

(5) The Content Of Our Thoughts Is Not As Relevant As The Impact Of Them To Understand Our Struggles

Your mind will never stop telling you “blah blah blah” or, as my aunt says in Spanish, “cha cha cha.” Our mind has a life of its own and it doesn’t stop relating and relating, connecting and connecting, and generating thousands and thousands of bits of content, anytime, anywhere. Whether you live in Europe, Asia, South America, Oceania, or Central America, our minds do it all the time.

Instead of checking the meaning of every single thought that pops up in your head – especially if you’re dealing with worries, fears, anxieties, obsessions – check the impact that getting hooked on them has in your life. Very different, right? For example, when working on this document, my mind has a thought of “did I turn off the stove? Would I be able to travel to Bolivia?”If I go along with the thoughts and get hooked on them, I’ll be searching stuff up on the internet, calling my family in Bolivia, and so on; there is nothing wrong with taking those actions, but I wouldn’t finish this write up and you wouldn’t get to hear about what it really means to be a behaviorist. 

Experiment:

Imagine for a moment that your brain is broadcasting news, then check two things:

(a)  If the radio is broadcasting something useful, tune into it!

(b) If the radio is broadcasting something unhelpful, tune your attention to what you’re doing at the moment.

(6) Acceptance-based Skills To All The Thoughts, Feelings, Sensations And Any Internal Experience We Have Is Required To Have Amazing Lives

Years of research showed us that fighting, arguing back, disputing our thoughts or any other internal experience we have, just makes things worse for us; so, we have learned that acceptance-based responses can actually take us further in our day-to-day life as we continue to experience all types of internal discomfort. Practicing acceptance skills doesn’t mean that our struggle goes away, it just means that we learn to keep moving while having it.

Acceptance is allowing, acknowledging, or making room for experiencing things as they are, whether they are happening outside of you or within you and whether they’re comfortable or not. And just to clarify a popular misconception: acceptance is not giving up, resigning, losing hope that things could be different, or being a doormat. It’s actually opening the door to experiences as they come.

Experiment:

Throughout a day, when having an uncomfortable thought, make the choice to have it and tell yourself “I’m having the thought of  … [ describe your thought]. Watch the thought as it is, as it’s happening.

(7) Responding Flexibly To The Yucky Stuff That Comes Under Our Skin Is Key To Do What We Want To Do With Our Lives

Psychological flexibility “is the ability to stay in contact with the present moment regardless of unpleasant thoughts, feelings, and bodily sensations, while choosing one’s behaviors based on the situation and personal values (Hayes, Luoma, Bond, Masuda, & Lillis, 2006; Wicksell, Olsson, & Hayes, 2011).  

Now, in plain terms, psychological flexibility is the ability to experience all the stuff – thoughts, feelings, sensations – that show up under your skin – comfortable and uncomfortable – and choose a response that’s effective in those moments and consistent with your personal values.

Many studies have identified psychological flexibility as a key variable associated with quality of life, well-being, reduction of mental health symptoms and how it determines when an internal struggle becomes a disorder (e.g. social anxiety disorder, specific phobias, obsessive-compulsive disorder, so on). Keep in mind that when thinking about well-being, based on current findings, I’m not referring to reduction or elimination of negative feelings but to the ability to navigate through the different demands of life when internal uncomfortable experiences arrive.

Experiment:

Think about a challenging situation that is repetitive, keeps coming back, and keeps showing up your way; when thinking about it, see if you can recall how you felt about it, the distress that came along, and name three old strategies you have been using over and over to handle those feelings. Now, for a couple of moments, what it would be like to simply acknowledge that discomfort that came along with those situations, do nothing about them, and instead, ask yourself, what’s the one thing you could do that will take you closer to be the person you want to be?

(8) Workability Trumps Accuracy Of Thinking

Workability, as a skill, means checking if the way you’re responding to your thoughts, feelings, and sensations, is workable towards building the life you want to have or taking you away from it. Notice here that I’m not saying that you should check whether your thoughts are accurate or not, true or not, false or not. So, let’s delve deeper into this idea. What does it mean to check whether the way you’re handling your thoughts is workable or not?

Let’s have a look at two scenarios, to make sense of this concept.

Scenario 1: When writing, my mind comes up with thoughts along the lines of “You don’t know what you’re doing, your writing is not good enough, no one is going to read your book.” If I get hooked on those thoughts and do what they tell me to do, I’ll stop writing right away, come up with excuses to not write, or distract myself with fun stuff. But any of those behaviors – in that situation – will take me far away from living according to my value of sharing and spreading the word about research-based skills that can be impactful in a person’s life.

Scenario 2: When my partner is getting ready to travel and asks me to spend time with him before his trip, I pause my writing. I do stop writing because, in that moment, I put my value of connecting with the people I love first. Here, not writing is a behavior that takes me towards my relationship value.

Do you see the difference? The same behavior, “ to stop writing,” can be a move towards or away from the stuff that we care about, based on the situation, the context, or the setting you’re in. 

Checking the workability of your behaviors is best thought of as checking if you’re living your life with direction, meaning, and vitality and focusing on the results of your behaviors (not the content of your mind).

Experiment

When having a strong urge to do something, to say something, ask yourself this:
If I go along with this thought, emotion or sensation, does it help me to be the person I want to be or does it take me further away?

(9) Our Context Matters

Context is a buzz word for modern behaviorists and many other disciplines. Within behavioral approaches, context has been understood as the setting in which a behavior happens: what precedes a behavior (antecedents) and what happens afterward (consequences). However, these days, we think of context in a much broader way because there are other variables that shape us such as our past history, family upbringing, socio-cultural context, historical struggles, and so on.

For instance, let’s imagine that on a super-hot day, after running for hours sweating in the car, I go to a restaurant, and to my surprise, the air conditioner is almost not working. I feel quite cranky and do something that is not so nice: I scream at the waitress. So applying a contemporary, contextual frame will mean looking at:

Larger context: a history of seeing family members fighting, people screaming at each other, not sleeping well the night before.
What happened before I screamed at the waitress?
What happened after I screamed at the waitress?

You see, the idea that behaviorists don’t address larger issues, or are doing superficial things, is quite far from the truth because we actually acknowledge and take into consideration the many variables that can influence our behavior.

This is why among radical behaviorists, you will often hear the expression “context matters” We’re shaped by all types of historical contexts – cultural, political, social, family, spiritual,- all types of physiological vulnerabilities – diet, medical conditions, genetical makeup – and yet, being shaped by our context, doesn’t mean being defined by any of those variables. 

Experiment:

For this experiment, think about a difficult situation you recently encountered, and the particular way in which you handle it – your behavior .- Next, consider different contextual variables that made this situation challenging for you.

You can use the questions below to guide this process.  

What was the challenging situation?

How did you behave?

What happened before you took action?

What happened after you took action?

What other factors may have made that situation challenging?

(10) Language Represents The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly

From the time we’re born until we die, language mediates all types of associations across symbolic stimuli; symbolic stimuli represent all types of private events (memories, feelings, thoughts, and experiences, such as flavors and smells) that we have throughout our lives and that are part of our learning history. 

Relational Frame Theory of language (RFT) has shown us over and over that our capacity to behave is shaped by language and cognition. What do I mean by that? Have you noticed the hundreds of connections that our brain is making at all times? For instance, think of an apple and recall all memories associated with it? Is it only one? Quite likely many! For instance, for me, the images that pop up were of a gathering I attended years ago, the grocery store I go to, a big round apple, apple pie, and somehow, the image of an apple in the middle of a river came up as well. That’s just one example of the hundreds of associations and thinking networks we carry in our minds.

Reality is that our brain is constantly relating one thing with another one based on our experiences; and on top of that, it also has the ability to relate to even unrelated words and ideas and without having the experience of them. For example, if I hear the word sadness – without having experienced it at that particular moment – but based on the messages I have heard, I may quickly associate it with something bad, something to get rid of. Here is another example of a derived relationship: if I have a panic attack in the elevator of my apartment and the next day I avoid the elevator not only in my apartment building but also in my friend’s building, a derived relationship has been established.

Experiment:

Look at the list of words below and see if you can put together two nouns with one adverb in a story format.

Pen More than
Chair Equals to
Thief Better than
Chocolate Looks like
Ocean Feels like
Kitty Less than

Next, see if those associations come up the rest of your day, and be ready, because you just created a new thinking network!

(11) Learning By Experience Is Key

Given that our mind has a life of its own, relates everything with everything, and is a natural, content-generating and pattern-making machine, every time we take our thoughts as the absolute truth or respond to thinking with more thinking we may end up having the opposite of what we want: becoming prisoners of our mind. But learning to take our thoughts lightly, gently, and focusing on what we experience – not what our mind says – can be liberating.

Experiment:

See if you can plan a mini trip to another city, country, or a place you haven’t been to. Next, before going on your trip, make sure you read at least 30-minutes about that place – weather, historical sites, fun things to do, architecture, shopping, and so on. Lastly, make your trip and focus on what it feels like, how it smells, the sounds of the streets, the flavors of the food you try, and so on.

At the end of your trip notice the difference between “learning about a place by reading” versus “learning about that place by having an experience of that place.”



GET YOUR FREE AUDIO GUIDE TO HARNESS THE POWER OF PERFECTIONISM

You have Successfully Subscribed!

HOW DO YOU PLAY-IT-SAFE?

  

Complete this 7-minutes quiz
and get your Playing-it-safe Profile!!

You have Successfully Subscribed!